A Reformed Response to Theonomy - Theocast
Most Comments
•
49m
In the first of two episodes on theonomy, Jon and Justin seek to generally define theonomy and then respond to it theologically. The guys consider a confessional understanding of the threefold division of the law, the distinction between moral and positive law, and 1689 Federalism as safeguards against theonomy.
Original video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tiOsq1DmnNQ
Up Next in Most Comments
-
A Critique of Practicing the Way (Par...
Bob and Barb discuss the informal logical fallacies that Comer uses to make spiritual formation sound pious. They go on to discuss discerning of spirits as found in 1John 4:1-3. This is not spiritual impressions or feelings; it's testing what is stated by people claiming to speak for God based on...
-
A Critique of Practicing the Way (Par...
In this episode we compare the mystical Jesus of John Mark Comer’s book to the true Jesus that Paul taught in Acts and First Corinthians. Paul used logical categories that could be understood using our rational minds, not awareness of presence as Comer claims. Paul told Fetus he spoke “words of s...
-
A Critique of Practicing the Way (Par...
In this episode we continue to examine John Mark Comer’s claim that we can be transformed through contemplation. Comer misuses key verses in Ephesians to do this. Bob exhorts listeners to believe what God has chosen to reveal in Scripture and reject mystical contemplation through which we suppose...
